Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe

RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe

From: Mercadante, Thomas F <NDATFM_at_labor.state.ny.us>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 07:40:10 -0400
Message-Id: <25946.338236@fatcity.com>


"One other note is that we have not had to failover due to a Win2K of Oracle problem in 18 months of running failsafe. We have found it to be extremely stable just not scalable froma CPU standpoint."

I totally agree with this. I am running FailSafe here also. The *only* failover's I experience is when the morons running the data center install software on the primary server and reboot the box. Failsafe brings the DB up on the other box without any problems. Works great.

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Johnson [mailto:Tony_Johnson_at_Trimble.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe

FailSafe comes with EE and works very well. It might even come with SE but I am not sure. Our
production environment fails over in less than 2 minutes. It is much simpler to set up ( ie no
SAN, raw devices or OCFS) and a heck of a lotr cheaper ( 20K$ / CPU for RAC ). One other
note is that we have not had to failover due to a Win2K of Oracle problem in 18 months of running
failsafe. We have found it to be extremely stable just not scalable froma CPU standpoint.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Hello all,

We have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes, using W2K, and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the purpose of high availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either RAC or Oracle Fail Safe. The confusion is over the fact that if we get HA with oracle Fail Safe, i.e. if one node is down due to any problem, then the other takes over, then can we do without RAC? Which of these two is more transparent to the user, i.e. which will take less time to shift the load from one node (server) to the other node? Can any one explain the benefits of using RAC over Oracle Fail Safe, or vice versa.

Regards,

Hussain

DBA SKMCH&RC
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--

Author: Hussain Ahmed Qadri
  INET: hussain_at_skm.org.pk

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--

Author: Tony Johnson
  INET: Tony_Johnson_at_Trimble.com
Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may Received on Thu Jul 17 2003 - 06:40:10 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US