RE: Why are SPFILEs binary anyway? (was RE: How to make SPFILE in

From: Jamadagni, Rajendra <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:08:13 -0400
Message-Id: <25946.338254@fatcity.com>

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------=_NextPartTM-000-ec40bcb5-984e-4d5a-ac38-0d302d98859d Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C34C6C.DC9EE017"

------_=_NextPart_001_01C34C6C.DC9EE017
Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Hey,

don't blame oracle for that ... did you complain to Microsoft when they created that Registry hive cr*p ?? Oracle is stepping on the same line ...

Lemmings ...

<g>

Raj

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Day [mailto:tday6_at_csc.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:54 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Why are SPFILEs binary anyway? (was RE: How to make SPFILE in

My experience also on Win2K. 9.2.0.1.0 the file is editable. On 9.2.0.3.0 results are unpredictable if you edit the file. I guess that they really don't want us editing it.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C34C6C.DC9EE017
Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2654.45">
<TITLE>RE: Why are SPFILEs binary anyway? (was RE: How to make SPFILE =
in</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

Hey,


don't blame oracle for that ... did you complain to =
Microsoft when they created that Registry hive cr*p ?? Oracle is = stepping on the same line ...

Lemmings ...


<g>
 Raj
 <FONT =

SIZE=3D2>---------------------------------------------------------------=
-----------------</FONT>

 Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
 All Views expressed in this email are strictly =
personal.
 QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is =
an art !

 

-----Original Message-----
 From: Thomas Day [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:tday6_at_csc.com">mailto:tday6_at_csc.com</A>]
 Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:54 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: Why are SPFILEs binary anyway? (was RE: =
How to make SPFILE
 in


My experience also on Win2K.  9.2.0.1.0 the file =
is editable.  On 9.2.0.3.0
 results are unpredictable if you edit the =
file.  I guess that they really
 don't want us editing it.


</BODY>
</HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C34C6C.DC9EE017--

------=_NextPartTM-000-ec40bcb5-984e-4d5a-ac38-0d302d98859d Content-Type: text/plain;

name="ESPN_Disclaimer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;

filename="ESPN_Disclaimer.txt"

********************************************************************This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.*********************************************************************2

Received on Thu Jul 17 2003 - 09:08:13 CDT