Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Partitions of table read only
You're missing something, but I couldn't say what...
I tried toying with the same thing, but I'm having a lazy afternoon, so I used Enterprise Manager:
Set up a new tablespace, created the table, sounds the same so far...
put a few rows into it, again using the nice graphical interface that avoids having to think or know what you're doing ;-)
Made the tablespace read only, checked that I couldn't update the table any more.
Dropped the table - gone, no complaints from the database.
The tablespace map shows the segment that had been being used by the table as a temporary segment.
Your suggestion about the metadata makes sense, the bitmap held in the LMT can't be the only information about that segment. When I get my brain back in gear, I'll try and work out where else to look for a better idea of what's happening.
Cheers
Simon Anderson
Rachel Carmichael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18/06/2003 18:29
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: Partitions of table read only
okay, am I missing something?
I created an LMT. Created a table in it. Gave no one quota on the tablespace.
did (both as system and sysdba)
alter tablespace test_drop read only;
and hung
what did I forget to do?
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services ---------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Wed Jun 18 2003 - 12:24:56 CDT
![]() |
![]() |