Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> PL/SQL- cursors and commits
I've been 'experimenting' with the following code in 8.1.5 and it seems to work fine. However,
my "ORACLE PL/SQL" book from O'REILLY (Steven Feuerstein Bill Pribyl 1997) leads me to
believe that it should not work. They state "As soon as a cursor with a FOR UPDATE is OPENed,
all rows...are locked. When [a COMMIT]..occurs, the locks...are released. As a result, you
cannot execute another FETCH against a FOR UPDATE cursor after you COMMIT......" They
go further to suggest an ORA-01002 would be returned.
Any comments? Thanks.
Kurt Wiegand
kurt.wiegand_at_cwusa.com
declare
local_f1 ctest.f1%TYPE := 0; local_f2 ctest.f2%TYPE := 0; batch_count number(6) := 0;
begin
open c_select;
loop
fetch c_select into local_f1, local_f2; exit when c_select%NOTFOUND; update ctest set f2 = f2 + 1 where current of c_select; batch_count := batch_count + 1; if batch_count > 99 then batch_count := 0; commit; end if;
end loop;
close c_select;
commit;
end;
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Wiegand, Kurt
INET: Kurt.Wiegand_at_CWUSA.COM
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services ---------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Fri Apr 04 2003 - 08:39:02 CST
![]() |
![]() |