Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: db_cache_size and cache buffer chain waits
This looks symptomatic of a problem with using a temporary table in a join. Because of anomalies with statistics on temporary tables, Oracle has chosen a completely mad execution plan - e.g. involving the temporary table as the inner table of a nested loops join.
(Not guaranteed, but reasonably likely).
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
For one-day tutorials:
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html )
____UK_______April 8th ____UK_______April 22nd ____Denmark May 21-23rd ____USA_(FL)_May 2nd
Next dates for the 3-day seminar:
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )
____UK_(Manchester)_May ____Estonia___June (provisional) ____USA_(CA, TX)_August
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
>
> >NB - when you say 'hanging' does you mean:
> > The CPU is working hard but the process
> > is not completing
> >
>
> The above is the condition I observed. There was a select cursor
that
> joined the temp table to several others that was showing the cache
> buffer chain waits; the update cursor, that updates rows in the temp
> table did not exhibit waits.
>
> --Glenn Stauffer
>
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jonathan Lewis INET: jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:14:03 CST
![]() |
![]() |