Let's see ...
Your DB_CACHE_SIZE is 16MB == 2048 blocks
The table is approx 14,677 blocks
The record-size is something like 800bytes
Each multiblock read call will read 32-blocks
Your DB_CACHE will be filled in less than 64 read-calls and will have
less than 1/7th of the table.
Your server will certainly be very busy doing physical reads for a
Full-Table-Scan of this table alone.
Now, the only thing I can suggest is to increase your DB_CACHE_SIZE
significantly.
16MB is too low for any activity in Oracle.
Hemant
At 09:54 AM 12-02-03 -0800, you wrote:
Hermant
and Chitale,
DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT=32
DB_CACHE_SIZE big
integer 16777216
DB_BLOCK_BUFFERS =
0
Tablespace is LMT with a
uniform size of 128 MB, DB not in archive mode is for a DW
system.
The time for the first run and
the re-run last the same.
To my understanding the table
has only one extent. This query runs in about 7 seconds. In
my production DB runs inmediately that is in NT also but
8.1.7.
SELECT TABLESPACE_NAME,
EXTENT_ID, BYTES/1048576, BLOCKS
FROM DBA_EXTENTS
WHERE
SEGMENT_NAME = 'DM_VENTAS'
TABLESPACE_NAME
EXTENT_ID BYTES/1048576 BLOCKS
------------------------------ ---------- ------------- ----------
DTMVENTAS
0
128 16384
TKS
- -----Original Message-----
- From: root@fatcity.com
[mailto:root@fatcity.com]
On Behalf Of Hemant K Chitale
- Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:59 AM
- To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
- Subject: RE: Count(*) last 30 seconds
- That's approx 100 records per blocks.
- What is the value of DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT ?
- Also, what is the elapsed time for the query if you re-run the query
immediately ?
- [the first run fetched everything in physical reads, the second run
should still
- find some or most blocks in the SGA, unless the DB_CACHE_SIZE or
DB_BLOCK_BUFFERS
- is very small].
- Hemant
- At 05:18 AM 12-02-03 -0800, you
wrote:
- Hermant, Sergey
-
- The table has 13 columns, the PK is formed for the first 11.
-
- There is no deletion nor update, just inserts in the table. I
had truncated the tables sometimes testing the procedure that load the
rows.
-
- This is the result with an auto trace.
-
- COUNT(*)
- ----------
- 1466196
-
- Execution Plan
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- 0 SELECT STATEMENT
Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=896 Card=1)
- 1 0 SORT (AGGREGATE)
- 2 1 TABLE
ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DM_VENTAS' (Cost=896 Card=1466196)
-
-
-
-
-
- Statistics
- ----------------------------------------------------------
- 0
recursive calls
- 0 db
block gets
- 14677 consistent gets
- 14644 physical reads
- 0 redo
size
- 386 bytes sent via
SQL*Net to client
- 503 bytes received
via SQL*Net from client
- 2
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
- 0 sorts
(memory)
- 0 sorts
(disk)
- 1 rows
processed
-
-
- -----Original Message-----
- From: root@fatcity.com
[mailto:root@fatcity.com]
On Behalf Of Hemant K Chitale
- Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:24 PM
- To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
- Subject: Re: Count(*) last 30 seconds
- You are doing Full-Table-Scans.
- 1. What's the average row length ? How many columns does
the table have ?
- 2. How many "consistent gets" does the count(*) cause
? [ie, how many blocks does it actually have to read ?]
- 3. Are all these Physical Reads ? Is the DB_CACHE_SIZE
large enough to hold most of the
- blocks ? What is the query-run-time if you re-run the query
immediately again ?
- Hemant
- At 08:19 AM 11-02-03 -0800, you wrote:
- Hi list,
- I issue a select count(*) from mytable and last 30 seconds.
- The table has 1,466,196 records and were loaded with a batch process, so they are in a countinous space.
- I consider that time exagerated.
- The TBS is LMT with a Uniform size of 128 MB.
- The block size is 8MB, version 9.2.0.1.0 in Windows 2000.
- Where should I start looking ???
- TIA
- Ramon E. Estevez
- com.banilejas@codetel.net.do
- 809-565-3121
-
- Hemant K Chitale
- My web site page is : http://hkchital.tripod.com
- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Hemant K Chitale INET: hkchital@singnet.com.sg Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Hemant K Chitale
My web site page is :
http://hkchital.tripod.com
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Hemant K Chitale INET: hkchital@singnet.com.sg Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051
http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Hemant K Chitale
My web site page is :
http://hkchital.tripod.com
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Hemant K Chitale
INET: hkchital@singnet.com.sg
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru@fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Feb 13 2003 - 09:15:03 CST