Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: BCHR Tuning
GASP... you mean I'm not the ONLY one who does that from time to time.
I feel so much better! :-)
>> WHEN does increasing the pctused to pctfree gap help ? And
>> should this be done by increasing the PCTFREE or decreasing
>> the PCTUSED -
>> ** It's a mistake I make quite often because of the image of
>> two lines across a data block representing the pctused and
>> pctfree levels. To push the pctfree line UP, you have to DECREASE
>> the pctfree value - and the entire paragraph was written from
>> the perspective of moving the lines, not changing the numbers.
-----Original Message-----
Lewis
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Jared,
Thanks for the note - I loved the closing lines especially.
I have to say that I've already spotted two error in my note, one of them a silly slip, but the other is likely to cause confusion.
Silly slip - in the bit about decreasing block sizes -
Good point - especially in Oracle 9; and especially if the waits are for UNDO blocks, although that might (depending on the nature of the activity) increase the waits on segment header blocks
Confusing comment - in the bit about the 'gap'
WHEN does increasing the pctused to pctfree gap help ? And should this be done by increasing the PCTFREE or decreasing the PCTUSED -
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
Coming soon a new one-day tutorial:
Cost Based Optimisation
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html )
Next Seminar dates:
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )
____England______January 21/23
____USA_(CA, TX)_August
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
-----Original Message-----
>
>Thanks Jonathan, for a breakdown on the cause and cure
>of buffer busy waits.
>
. . .
>
>The abstract for one of Niemic's presentation at IOUG states
>that folks trying to encourage others to use some intelligence in
>maintaining their systems must have some vested interest.
>
>This works both ways I guess. :)
>
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jonathan Lewis INET: jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Robert Freeman INET: robertgfreeman_at_yahoo.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Sun Jan 19 2003 - 01:08:58 CST
![]() |
![]() |