Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re:one datafile lost.
The answer is yes & no. First off tablespace data_small will go offline as soon
as Oracle realizes that the datafile is gone. At this point any insert, update,
or delete that involves a table and/or index in data_small will fail. Therefore
there will be no inconsistencies.
Dick Goulet
____________________Reply Separator____________________ Author: "BigP" <big_planet_2000_at_hotmail.com> Date: 1/16/2003 9:29 AM
Just wondering what will happen in this condition .
supposse I have two tablespaces data_large and data_small . with datafiles data_large01.dbf and data_small01.dbf . some transactions affects tables in both tablespaces . Now one day I lost data_small01.dbf data files . I thought of recovering that data file from one day old backup . when I recover this data data file , will oracle maintain transactio consistency for all transaction happened today . becuase data_large01.dbf is up to date . but data_small01.dbf is one day old . will oracle keep this in mind while applying archived logs at the time of recovery .
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<SCRIPT>function SetDomain(d) { document.domain = d; }</SCRIPT>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Just wondering what will happen in this condition
.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>supposse I have two tablespaces data_large and
data_small . with datafiles data_large01.dbf and data_small01.dbf . some
transactions affects tables in both tablespaces . Now one day I lost
data_small01.dbf data files . I thought of recovering that data file from one
day old backup . </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>when I recover this data data file , will oracle
maintain transactio consistency for all transaction happened today . becuase
data_large01.dbf is up to date . but data_small01.dbf is one day old . will
oracle keep this in mind while applying archived logs at the time of recovery
.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: INET: dgoulet_at_vicr.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Thu Jan 16 2003 - 12:20:10 CST
![]() |
![]() |