Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RE : RMAN Repository
Yeah but do you have to pay for another Veritas NetBackup license and server
to backup the catalog? If just have one database server and one database
license why should I have to buy another license and install another 1-2GB
of Oracle software on another server? The only answer I can think of is so
Larry can spend more money on yachts, planes, and cars.
Contrary to Oracle Corporate aspirations, not all data in the universe really needs to be stored in Oracle databases, especially backup information about Oracle databases I want to backup. If I need a database to backup a database then do I need another database to backup the database that backed up the original database? ;-) Seems the simple solution to this silliness is just to remove the requirement of having a database to backup a database.
Steve Orr
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:50 AM
To: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
Cc: Orr, Steve
Importance: High
> The overhead of the repository database is more. With the initial
releases of RMAN (EBU) Oracle was rightly
> criticized for the fact that you had to backup the database that holds
information about the database you want to backup.
> Getting rid of this silliness seems reasonable to me.
Why silly?
It isn't any more silly than making a separate backup of the Veritas Netbackup catalog.
It's just a different level of abstraction.
Jared
"Orr, Steve" <sorr_at_rightnow.com>
Sent by: root_at_fatcity.com
01/09/2003 08:45 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com> cc: Subject: RE: RE : RMAN Repository
If you aren't using a repository all you have to do is make sure control file backups are part of the routine. There are 2 ways to backup the backup metadata: 1) the RMAN repository database; 2) backup controlfiles. Functionally and operationally they're pretty much the same. The only things you can't do with controlfile RMAN/database metadata is: 1) use previous "incarnations" of the database for recovery; 2) use database stored scripts. No big deal as far as I'm concerned. When RMAN first came out a separate repository database was a requirement. Subsequent releases added some functionality for using controlfiles. The vulnerability of losing the repository or losing the backup controlfile is about equivalent. The overhead of the repository database is more. With the initial releases of RMAN (EBU) Oracle was rightly criticized for the fact that you had to backup the database that holds information about the database you want to backup. Getting rid of this silliness seems reasonable to me.
Steve Orr-man for RMAN,
Bozeman, Montana
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Importance: High
And how does one go about restoring a database when all control files
are lost, and the only recovery data is stored in the control file?
This doesn't sound very reasonable.
Jared
"Deshpande, Kirti" <kirti.deshpande_at_verizon.com>
Sent by: root_at_fatcity.com
01/08/2003 11:44 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
cc: Subject: RE : RMAN RepositoryJoe,
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Orr, Steve INET: sorr_at_rightnow.com Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Thu Jan 09 2003 - 12:18:04 CST
![]() |
![]() |