Oracle-L: Re:OT: Guidelines/Standards for supporting non-oracle databa

From: <dgoulet_at_vicr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:52:46 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00516F60.20021210135246@fatcity.com>

Rick,

Similar situation over here as well. The party line on Access and other similar projects is "you are on your own.". Seems to work pretty darn well. Hasn't stopped them and it keps the fires out of here.

Dick Goulet

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Author: Rick_Cale_at_teamhealth.com
Date:       12/10/2002 1:15 PM

Hi,

We are virtually an Oracle shop with 2-3 sql server databases due to 3rd-party software restrictions.
We have been asked about supporting other "small" databases such as Access,etc within our company. My question is if you were asked to support "smaller" databases what restrictions/guidelines/standards are worth considering? Be kind-constructive answers only :-)

Thanks
Rick

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author:
INET: Rick_Cale_at_teamhealth.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author:
INET: dgoulet_at_vicr.com

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------