Re: OPS Sequences: nocache == order ??

If you run OPS and specify order, it works like no cache.

My question to you: "Why cripple OPS and your business performance by having this requirement ?" Spending a few bucks to get rid of this dependency will improve the performance, until you run in to the next problem ;-)

Anjo.

On Wednesday 04 September 2002 00:00, you wrote:
> I'm managing an OPS configuration (4x HP 9000/N, HP-UX 11/64 , RDBMS
> 8.1.7.1)
> and I'm having an application dependency on a temporal order of sequence
> numbers.
> With OPS that becomes a problem because each node caches a set of sequence
> numbers
> (20 by default). Oracle has an option, specifically for that situation,
> namely "ORDER".
> My question is whether ORDER is the same thing as NOCACHE and whether it is
> possible
> to have a NOCACHE sequence which will return numbers in an incorrect order
> (larger number
> before the smaller one).
> Please, o OPS gods and godesses, help me out and I'll sacrifice you a beer
> when I see you.
> Mladen Gogala

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Anjo Kolk
  INET: anjo_at_oraperf.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).