Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle 81745 upgrade and PL/SQL version
Bruce,
I think the minor releases have to be applied to the first one in the series, i.e. 8.1.7.4.5 would go on top of 8.1.7.4.1..
To go from 8.1.7.2.0, follow this path:
8.1.7.2.0 --> 8.1.7.4.1. --> 8.1.7.4.5.
It may be though that 8.1.7.4.1 can only go on top of 8.1.7.3, which would add at least another step.
The first in the series usually uses the Oracle Installer; the later (minor) ones ask us to archive files and replace them manually.
I haven't applied 8.1.7.4.5, maybe that one is different.
Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)
Systems Admin & Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes Technology Services | Services technologiques Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique Maritimes Region, DFO | Région des Maritimes, MPO
E-Mail: boivinp_at_mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca
-----Original Message-----
[mailto:Bruce.Reardon_at_comalco.riotinto.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:03 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Oracle 81745 upgrade and PL/SQL version
Hi,
Yesterday I upgraded a database from 81725 to 81745 on W2K SP3 (the DB
doesn't have JVM in it).
Before the upgrade, product_component_version showed the PL/SQL version as
version "8.1.7.2.0".
After the upgrade, the PL/SQL version is shown as 8.1.7.3.
The product_component_version table in total shows:
Product Version ----------------------------------- --------- NLSRTL 3.4.1.0.0 Oracle8i Enterprise Edition 8.1.7.4.1 PL/SQL 8.1.7.3.0 TNS for 32-bit Windows: 8.1.7.4.0
So the other products are showing as 8174 but not PLSQL.
Has any one else seen this - I couldn't find any reference to it on Metalink?
We have another database that has been upgraded to 81741 (this one is on NT4 SP6a).
This one shows "PL/SQL 8.1.7.4.0" inproduct_component_version.
Any suggestions are welcome.
I don't know at this stage if this is a problem, but it is an (as yet)
unexplained difference and I don't like those sort of differences.
Thanks,
Bruce Reardon
mailto:bruce.reardon_at_comalco.riotinto.com.au
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY)
INET: Bruce.Reardon_at_comalco.riotinto.com.au
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Tue Aug 27 2002 - 07:18:36 CDT
![]() |
![]() |