Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> what is wrong with this idea ...
Hi. We have a table in our data warehouse which keeps
info about calls made. This table has a child table
with some detailed information about parts of the
call. There may be any number of "parts" within a call
(1 to many) and every part has a status.
MY developer wants to add a string field to the parent table which will concatinate all the statuses for all the parts within this call. For example if a call has 4 parts and their statuses are "A","B","A" and "F", the value of that field will be "ABFA". Then the developer will be able to query smalle parent table instead of a large child table in order to see how many calls had at least one part with status "A" or statuses "A" and "F" etc by using a INSTR (or SUBSTR) command.
Would it be better (from performance/CPU standpoint) to add several separate fields: STATUS_A_CNT, STATUS_B_CNT (the list of status codes is fairly static) instead? There is something about this string that rubs me the wrong way, but I can't put my finger on it.
Any thoughts?
thank you
Gene
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Gurelei INET: gurelei_at_yahoo.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-LReceived on Wed Aug 14 2002 - 08:18:30 CDT
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
![]() |
![]() |