Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Checking the rebuildability of an index
I am no internals expert but even if the index has grown the access path
should not be scanning the entire 68 meg or 30 meg for that matter. I guess
what I am getting at is maybe we need to see some real data here and see
what we are getting for our money. Your points are well taken and I agree,
I have even probably been guilty of this myself at times :(
Ethan Post
perotdba (AIM), epost1 (Yahoo)
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 3:47 PM
To: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
Cc: Ethan.Post_at_ps.net
I don't do it often, but there are times that it's needed.
One I rebuilt recently went from 68 Meg to ~30 meg. This makes a significant reduction in time spent scanning that index, and reduces pressure on the cache buffer.
Most may not need rebuilt often, but you should be able to point at data telling you which ones should be rebuilt, which ones shouldn't be rebuilt, and why.
There's also the political CYA factor, such as the hot shot consultant that's checking out your systems and wants to know why your indexes haven't been rebuilt, or your buffer hit ratio is 65%, and then proceeds to report to management that you aren't doing your job.
You need to have convincing answers for these questions, backed up by data.
Jared
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Post, Ethan
INET: Ethan.Post_at_ps.net
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Tue Aug 06 2002 - 17:03:28 CDT
![]() |
![]() |