Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Replication question
Jarad,
A standby is simpler, however it has limited use for offloading some system load (opening for read access suspends roll forward, so the data is somewhat stale). By using Master-Master synchronous replication with good deadlock handlers, you can use BOTH instances so you get the benefit of not having an unused instance lying around (damagement hates that), but still have fail over available. Since you can have different users/locations attach to different instances, you also get some scalability advantages.
In general, I agree a standby is MUCH simpler.
John P Weatherman
Database Administrator
Replacements Ltd.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Curious, that note suggests Advanced Replication as a failover methodology.
Seems that a standby database would be _much_ simpler.
Any thoughts ( from anyone ) on why one would use AR for failover, rather than using a standby database?
Jared
John Weatherman <john.weatherman_at_replacements.com>
Sent by: root_at_fatcity.com
06/14/2002 09:50 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com> cc: Subject: RE: Replication question
Mitchell,
There are a LOT of good papers in Metalink. I've been getting my own
education over the last few months. Replication is a really great swiss
army knife though, you need to do a little looking for what you
specifically
need to do, then test, test, test. Oh, and did I mention test? :) I
found
Note: 138181.1 particularly helpful. Oh, and plan on some TARs. I have
found Support very helpful/informative in this area.
Good Luck,
John P Weatherman
Database Administrator
Replacements Ltd.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi all
I will work on replication soon. any advice for reference I can get.
Thanks in advance.
Mitchell
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: John Weatherman
INET: john.weatherman_at_replacements.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: Jared.Still_at_radisys.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Fri Jun 14 2002 - 13:19:29 CDT
![]() |
![]() |