RE: Oracle 9.0.1.3 or 9.2.0?

From: Jamadagni, Rajendra <Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:28:05 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0047D7B0.20020613162805@fatcity.com>

We started with 9011 then had bunch of patches for the bugs we discovered for Oracle, then we went to 9012 and some problems (like temp blobs leak, xml parts crash, smon leak etc) still persisted. But the application is holding itself better than first version. Due to world cup we have delayed 9013. I have 9.2 running on NT (no we are not allowed to even dream about putting a prod server on NT), and AIX.

The other day one of the developer sent a email asking what are our plans for 9.2 deployment, and my Unix admin (who probably can double as DBA at times) goes "next decade, dude."

By looking at the problems we have on 9x release, we have asked for a solid 3 months full load test before we even want to consider 9.2 (and probably 15 patches) deployment.

Raj

---

Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jamadagni, Rajendra
  INET: Rajendra.Jamadagni_at_espn.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



text/plain attachment: ESPN_Disclaimer.txt

Received on Thu Jun 13 2002 - 19:28:05 CDT