RE: MySQL versus Oracle

From: Gogala, Mladen <MGogala_at_oxhp.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 15:18:17 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.0047204E.20020602151817@fatcity.com>

Actually, I experimented with the table that contains the information about my MP3 collection (approximately 1100 titles) and I'm trying to re-work
a tool that uses MySQL to store the information into one that will use Oracle.
MP3 files will be items of the type BFILE. That would give me unique client-server
listening capabilities, which is immensely useful when you know that I own 2 PCs linked with ethernet and only one among them has a decent soundcard. Needless
to say, all of the MP3 files are on the same PC as well. My bosses would probably be delighted if I started using our production database to store my MP3 collection.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

1. It's blindingly fast as a single user database, faster then oracle.

Really? Even with a 30 million record table?

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: MGogala_at_oxhp.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Sun Jun 02 2002 - 18:18:17 CDT