RE: MySQL versus Oracle

• "Weaver, Walt" <wweaver_at_rightnow.com> on 05/31/02 13:59:22 -0800

> If there's only one user accessing it, yes.
>
> --Walt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:44 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> a) It's blindingly fast as a single user database, faster then oracle.
>
> Really? Even with a 30 million record table?

Depends on what they are doing. MySQL doesn't claim to be ACID, just fast. If multiple users are reading a table that isn't configured for locks then it could be faster than Oracle. The overhead and complexity introducted into Oracle by rollback handling is a major slowdown for anythng the database does.

This is mainly a matter of applying a tool in the way it was designed to be used. MySQL is intended for primarily readaccess  databases or smaller ones where the less granular locking is not so much of a problem.

--
Steven Lembark                              2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing                      Chicago, IL 60647
                                           +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: lembark_at_wrkhors.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).