| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Inline View Query Versus Ordinary Query - Comparison
Query using Inline View Query an Ordinary one ? Which is Better w.r.t. Performance & Why ?
EXAMPLE - Following 2 SAMPLE Queries give the SAME Output . But which would be better ?
SQL> SELECT INT_TBL_CODE, TO_CHAR(LCHG_TIME, 'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
2 FROM ITC
3 WHERE ENTITY_ID = 'D6935' AND
4 ENTITY_TYPE = 'ACCNT' AND
5 START_DATE >= TO_DATE('01-01-1900' ,'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
6 AND END_DATE <= TO_DATE('31-12-2099' ,'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
7 AND ENTITY_CRE_FLG = 'Y'
8 AND DEL_FLG = 'N'
9 AND TO_CHAR(LCHG_TIME,'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') = (
10 SELECT TO_CHAR(MAX(LCHG_TIME),'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
11 FROM TBA_INT_TBL_CODE_TBL
12 WHERE START_DATE >= TO_DATE('01-01-1900' ,'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
13 AND END_DATE <= TO_DATE('31-12-2099' ,'DD-MM-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
14 AND ENTITY_ID = 'D6935' AND ENTITY_TYPE = 'ACCNT'
15 AND ENTITY_CRE_FLG = 'Y'
16 AND DEL_FLG = 'N' )
INT_T TO_CHAR(LCHG_TIME,'
----- -------------------
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=49) 1 0 FILTER
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'INT_TBL_CODE_TABLE' (C
ost=3 Card=1 Bytes=49)
3 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_INT_TBL_CODE_TABLE' (UNIQUE
) (Cost=2 Card=1)
4 1 SORT (AGGREGATE)
5 4 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'INT_TBL_CODE_TABLE'
(Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=45)
6 5 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_INT_TBL_CODE_TABLE' (UNIQ
UE) (Cost=2 Card=1)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
9 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
482 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
425 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
SQL>
INT_T LCG
----- -------------------
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=10 Card=1 Bytes=15) 1 0 COUNT (STOPKEY)
2 1 VIEW (Cost=10 Card=1 Bytes=15)
3 2 SORT (ORDER BY STOPKEY) (Cost=10 Card=1 Bytes=49)
4 3 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'INT_TBL_CODE_TABLE
' (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=49)
5 4 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_INT_TBL_CODE_TABLE' (UN
IQUE) (Cost=2 Card=1)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
4 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
444 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
425 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: VIVEK_SHARMA INET: VIVEK_SHARMA_at_infosys.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing ListsReceived on Tue May 21 2002 - 16:23:42 CDT
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
![]() |
![]() |