| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: too low optimizer_index_cost_adj causing bizarre index choice
Is this surprising? I still remember an Oracle presentation when 8i was
first coming out and the Oracle rep answered a question about hints by
saying that no one should use hints any more because the optimizer always
used the best path.
Half the room burst out laughing :).
Jay Miller
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
choice
Even Oracle was reluctant
to admit that it was accessing a wacko index until I
pressed them for it. I asked them to give me the
relevant CBO code, but noooooo, not even a decent
10053 doc.....
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Miller, Jay
INET: JayMiller_at_TDWaterhouse.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Fri May 10 2002 - 10:54:34 CDT
 |
 |