Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: ERD generation tool - Active Comparisons
Am I speaking to the wind ....
For Compares, why would you compare the MODEL with the DATABASE...like going from US to London via Tokyo... ... and you get to pay more, like... you pay not for distance, but for "time in the air"... If a tool takes longer to do something, makes more mistakes, is bumpy and complex... you get to pay more.
For compares, someone tell me what beats
ActiveCompare:
http://www.iraje.com/compare-diff.htm
http://www.iraje.com/ActiveCompare_viewlet.html
...and I will switch my tool.
Keith
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 13:00:31 -0800
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L"
<ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
Reply-to: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
to Address Book
Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego,
California
ERWin's not much better. Has some better modeling
capability as you
might guess, but has some VERY annoying quirks too.
You also need to
drill down endlessly when doing a compare and I have
seen it see two exact
tables (even case being the same) and see them as
different. The DO
have a MATCH button that I would SUPPOSE allows you to
re-align them, but
I would not know for sure as I get Dr. Watson's
whenever I press it and
the whole thing crashes!
I had a nice BUG last week only. Generated scripts
for the model, ran
them on the db, then ran a compare from the model to
the db. Darn
thing came up with differences....
Furthermore, I find that if you work from the Logical
Model (like I
do), the changes are not equally presented to the
physical model.... (ie
name change./datatype change) and its NOT consistent
with this behavior
either!
It has a report builder, but it doesn't report on
datatypes entered on
the Logical side (even though the datatype on the
physical MAY be
different) = therefore you can't run any consistency
reports between the
Logical and Physical models.
I have been using ERWin both as a modeling tool and a
change repository
for the model. I like to run several reports
against a model (I call
them the Sanity Checks Reports).... you know, make
sure that all
columns named the same (ie DESCRIPTION) are of the
same datatype, length,
etc.....
Anyhow, I can rant and rant.
ERWin's BIGGEST Annoyance is my book is that there is
no UNDO feature
and it is rather easy to accidentally drop and drag
either a
relationship or field when re-aligning the model......
ugh....
I wish we could get together a group and benchmark
some relatively
unknown but stable modeling tool who's maker will
listen to the DBA
community and put their name in the market (IE. give
them market share) in
exchange for giving our community a tool that would
actually work for us
and work well!
Rant over now.
Please continue.......
>
> * It cannot handle obejcts (CLOBs, BLOBs, ...) that
are not stored
inline.
> If you place CLOBs in a different tablesapce form
the rest of the
row, you
> will have to manually manipulate the DDL.
>
> * It has no schema-schema comparision capabilities,
only
schema-model.
>
> * Examining the results of schema-model comparision
is extremely
awkward,
> time consuming, and aggravating. One has to
continually "drill down"
in a
> miniscule window using the "Windows Explorer" type
interface to see
anything
> meaningful.
>
> There are some other significant deficiencies also.
I talked to them
about
> all these and more. What I got was the same answer
that I got two
years ago
> also. "We'll put it on the enhancement request
list." or "We've
been
> intending to do that."
> Personally, I think that packages have been around
long enough that a
> multi-thousand dollar per seat tool should be able
to handle them by
now!
>
> Unfortunately, I don't know of any great modeling
tool right now.
Designer
> does everything, but definitely has some quirks. If
you use another
RDBS,
> it probably won't handle it well. In addition, it
wants to do things
its
> own way, not your way. Some also say it has the
world's most obtuse
> interface. Simply sit someone that is familiar with
modeling, but
> unfamiliar with Designer, down in front of the GUI
and see how long
it takes
> them to generate a readable ER diagram! (To make
this "fair",
compared to
> other tools, don't give them any documentation other
than the online
help,
> but start it up and connect it to a database before
you turn it
over). It
> could be days, perhaps weeks!
>
> Don Granaman
> [OraSaurus]
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Keith Peterson INET: keithpson_at_yahoo.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Wed May 01 2002 - 16:50:17 CDT
![]() |
![]() |