Re: LOG_BUFFER Parameter Question

Yep,

wrong tree. size it like: redo blocks per tx * tx/sec * 3/2 *<physical blocksize>

Anjo.

Denham Eva wrote:

>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been wondering about how to work out what the optimal
> LOG_BUFFER parameter,
> compared to the physical size of the REDOLOG file, for the best
> optimization and writes from buffer to log.
> Or am I barking up the wrong tree? Is there some other way of doing
> this.
>
> i.e. redolog file size is 10M and LOG_BUFFER is 512000.
> Can this be optimized better?
>
> Denham Eva
> Oracle DBA
> In UNIX Land
> On a quiet Night, you can hear the Windows machines reboot.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and
> cleared by MailMarshal - For more information please visit
> www.marshalsoftware.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Anjo Kolk
  INET: anjo_at_oraperf.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).