Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Clob indexes
It would make sense,
I would expect Oracle to take a shortcut with LOB Indexes, simply hard-coding the fact that access to the LOB should always be via the LOB index. Consequently there would be no point in thinking about them
You could run SQL_TRACE prior to the
dbms_stats call, and see if there is a
'bitand(flag,NNNN)' line in the query that
identifies indexes that excludes LOB indexes.
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
Author of:
Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases
Next Seminar - Australia - July/August
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
-----Original Message-----
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
Date: 23 April 2002 22:52
I've hit bug 1499329
As a workaround, I'm analysing the tables in the staging environment then I'm doing an exchange partition.
I can analyse the tables/indexes without problem in
the staging environment.
My question is when creating a clob, Oracle creates a
sys_...$$ indexes. When analysing the schema, those
sys_...$$ indexes do not have any statistics. Is that
normal ?
TIA
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Jonathan Lewis
INET: jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Wed Apr 24 2002 - 02:38:24 CDT
![]() |
![]() |