Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: MySQL vs. Oracle database

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle database

From: Orr, Steve <sorr_at_rightnow.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:42:35 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.004485D4.20020418104235@fatcity.com>


Here's a quote from a most definitive resource, New Riders' book "MySQL" by Paul DuBois,

"The server has two kinds of locking. It uses internal locking to keep requests from clients from interfering with each other-- for example, to keep one client's SELECT query from being interrupted by another client's UPDATE query." (p. 472.)

Steve Orr
Bozeman, Montana

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

What makes you think that MySQL has read consistency?

> For read
> consistency I think MySQL is actually putting locks on tables
> during a query
> and when you have some intense queries with a lot of concurrent
> users they
> have to wait in line like 1000 rowdy kindergardeners.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: sorr_at_rightnow.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Received on Thu Apr 18 2002 - 13:42:35 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US