RE: MySQL vs. Oracle database

• "Weaver, Walt" <wweaver_at_rightnow.com>

> I don't think you're wrong. MySQL gets dissed frequently on this list, but
> it's really a nice little product. IMHO it's much closer to Oracle than
> Access.
>
> It works well for us. Doesn't scale like Oracle, but works well.

In some ways it scales better than Oracle. For load+query (a.k.a., "warehouse") operations it can be faster than Oracle because it doesn't get tangled up with rollbacks, etc. On systms with many "instances" it also can be much simpler to administer.

--
Steven Lembark                               2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing                       Chicago, IL 60647
                                            +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Steven Lembark
  INET: lembark_at_wrkhors.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).