Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Long running SQL Problem? [stupid alternative to NOT IN]
ORACLE-L Digest -- Volume 2002, Number 086
> From: Denham Eva <EvaD_at_TFMC.co.za>
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:58:23 +0200
> Subject: Long running SQL Problem?
...
> Is there anyone who can give me a solution to this problem.
get faster/more RAM, CPU, hard drives, etc?
> It is a sql that runs forever and I eventually have to kill it, both tables
> are large 500000 + rows.
> Is there perhaps a quicker more effecient way of doing this.
>
>
> SELECT col1,col2
> FROM Table_1
> WHERE (col1,col2) NOT IN (SELECT col3,col4 FROM Table_2);
these are indexed?
probably no faster, but will probably barf out the initial chunks of output as it goes along, and thus seem slightly less boring to anyone observing the output during runtime:
SELECT
col1, col2
col3, col4
Table_1 t1, Table_2 t2 WHERE t1.col1 = t2.col3 (+) and t1.col2 = t2.col4 (+) and ( t2.col3 is null and t2.col4 is null );
btw, there is a similar alternative using "exists", but I haven't found it to be any faster.
regards,
ep
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Eric D. Pierce INET: PierceED_at_csus.edu Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Wed Mar 27 2002 - 17:03:39 CST
![]() |
![]() |