Re: DBMS Job vs C Daemon

Raj,

Was it some kind of patch for 9011 or 9012, which fixed dbms_job? Could you provide some details?
It's very important for us, because we rely heavily on dbms_job (NT environment, looking to upgrade to 9i).

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
ineyman_at_perceptron.com

• Original Message ----- To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:18 AM

> While I agree that dbms_job is the right way, we had lots of problems with
> dbms_job suddenly failing (i.e. it just stops working) in 9011 and 9012
> versions of database. Finally it was something to do with job queue
> processes, with the help of OWS we fixed it. BUT, I still don't trust
> dbms_job on our 9i production db and hence all critical jobs are run by
our
> close friend 'cron', it works!.
>
> Raj
> ______________________________________________________
> Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
> Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
> Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN
Inc.
>
> QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Igor Neyman
  INET: ineyman_at_perceptron.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).