Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Oracle standby strange behavior

RE: Oracle standby strange behavior

From: Vadim Gorbounov <vgorbounov_at_simplyengineering.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:29:17 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.00400F27.20020130112550@fatcity.com>

Hi, Yuval<SPAN
class=409482219-30012002>.
Did you make sure, you've got
latest data transferred and applied?
I bet, these two tables have
largest OBJECT_ID in the original DB.
 
Before you activate standby,
do
1. On
production
  SQL> alter system
switch logfile;
 
2. Transfer all archived logs
to standby and make sure they are applied.  
Hopefully, no more
problem.
 
Vadim
 

  <FONT face=Tahoma
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Yuval Arnon   [mailto:Yuval.Arnon_at_wwfent.com]Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002   1:41 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:   Oracle standby strange behavior
  Hi, I ran into a strange behavior of a   standby database. On the primary db I have an   application schema and a query schema. All tables from   the appl schema have public synonyms and a grant select to public.   User query is created with connect and resource roles.   Once I switch over to the standby db , and put it in read   only mode, and then connect to the query user, I can not perform a select   against 2 of the 35 tables. I get object OBJECT_NAME does not exist.
  I can connect to the system user on the standby database and I   have no problem selecting from all the tables.   Any idea what am I missing??
  Yuval.
  -----Original Message----- From: Orr,   Steve [mailto:sorr_at_rightnow.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:35 PM <FONT   size=2>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <FONT   size=2>Subject: RE: Performance Tuning   Rachel IS kind but her words are also true and I think this   was her main focus in this case.  ;-)   My Alomari book was for v7 and was good but is now dated...   Is it up to date for 8i/9i?
  -----Original Message----- Sent:
  Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:11 AM To: Multiple   recipients of list ORACLE-L
  Rachel, Thank you so much for you kind   words and the very interesting comparison.. :)

  the 101 book conforms most closely to Oracle's current   thinking on performance tuning

Received on Wed Jan 30 2002 - 13:29:17 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US