Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Database Performance Question
Parentitions and
Maternalized Views are supposed to come out in 10i.
<FONT color=#0000ff
size=2>
(Paternalized
views take longer, they required retrofitting onto the
kernel
command tree.
)
<FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>-----Original Message-----From:
Godlewski, Melissa [mailto:Melissa.Godlewski_at_hq.doe.gov]Sent:
Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:36 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Database Performance
Question
Partitions, Materialized views, bit map indexes.
-----Original Message----- From:
SRAJENDRAN_at_nlfs.com [<A
href="mailto:SRAJENDRAN_at_nlfs.com">mailto:SRAJENDRAN_at_nlfs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:25 AM <FONT
size=2>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <FONT
size=2>Subject: Database Performance Question
Hello all:
We have an application that is having slow response time
against an 8i database, I would like to improve the
response time. This is a web based application
accessing the database with about 2000 users. Most of the <FONT
size=2>application queries are based on complex joins on 4 big tables with
each having over 5 million rows( biggest table has 18
million rows). I have tuned the Package queries
for the best explain plan possible, but still do not
seem to make dramatic change in the response time. Though, I was
able to make significant headway tuning these packages
by bringing down response times from 7 minutes to
under 3 minutes. But this is not an acceptable <FONT
size=2>response time from a web-application perspective.
I am considering creating data cubes based on the most
frequently used join conditions and pre-populate them
on a nightly basis or use triggers to update the cube
simultaneously. I am hoping that this enhance
the response times.
I would greatly appreciate your suggestions or opinions on
this idea. If you have an alternative/better way of
achiving this please enlighten me.
Thank very much. Srini
Rajendran.