Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: 'bug' with describe command

RE: 'bug' with describe command

From: Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY) <Bruce.Reardon_at_comalco.riotinto.com.au>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:40:07 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.003ED63C.20020110212020@fatcity.com>

Steve,

I have come across it but don't know a solution. The feature / bug is present in 8.1.7.1.4 and 8.1.7.2.5 on NT / W2K.

HTH,
Bruce Reardon

-----Original Message-----

Sent: Friday, 11 January 2002 9:00

I have recently converted from 7.3.4 to 8i. The conversion went well, but I have finally gotten around to dealing with an annoying problem. The problem is that since the 8 conversion my sqlplus session returns the output from describe in a strange manner. The Name column for example is close to 200 characters long. I can control this by setting my sqlplus linesize to something more pedestrian than the 500 characters I have set in my login.sql.

  The output of the describe command when describing a package is as expected, regardless of linesize. So in my opinion this is not a feature.

Any chance any of you have run across this in the past? I am hoping a patch exists, because 8.1.6 is the final release for my OS platform.

Author: Steve McClure
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY)
  INET: Bruce.Reardon_at_comalco.riotinto.com.au

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Thu Jan 10 2002 - 23:40:07 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US