From Kim_Thompson@ci.sf.ca.us Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:57:01 -0800 From: Kim_Thompson@ci.sf.ca.us Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:57:01 -0800 Subject: Re: Oracle license historic price Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain The Oracle pricing for named:concurrent user was a factor of 2:1, I remember distinctly since we converted a number of named users to concurrent when we signed a contract for our network license agreement a few years ago. I thought that ratio was low, since you get a lot more value from the concurrent license in terms of supporting users. Kim ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Author: Djordje Jankovic at ~ctl-internet-po Date: 11/19/01 12:01 PM Hi, Anybody happen to know what was the ratio between a concurrent license and named user license price, when oracle used to have those licensing models (before switching to famous UPU). I would like to see how fair is conversion factor of 2 that oracle now uses from concurrent -> named license conversion. Thanks. Djordje RE: applications patches
Hi,
 
Anybody happen to know what was the ratio between a concurrent license and named user license price, when oracle used to have those licensing models (before switching to famous UPU).  I would like to see how fair is conversion factor of 2 that oracle now uses from concurrent -> named license conversion.
 
Thanks.
 
Djordje