RE: applications patches

From: Jerry Hess <JHess_at_amctheatres.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:50:05 -0800
Message-ID: <F001.003C8977.20011119090024@fatcity.com>

I
wouldn't try it.  It could be a Client side patch. When searching Metalink put in your client hardware not your server hardware and see if you see the patch then. If not call support.

  <FONT face=Tahoma
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Adams, Matthew (GEA, 088130)   [mailto:MATT.ADAMS_at_APPL.GE.COM]Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001   10:45 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:   applications patches
  I just got a lovely requirement to patch <FONT

  size=2>an Oracle Purchasing instance.  (Evidently, <FONT 
  size=2>I'm suddenly an Oracle Applications DBA, how <FONT 
  size=2>did that happen?) 

  Anyway, the patch (2094819) appears to depend <FONT   size=2>on another patch (2092683) that does not appear <FONT   size=2>to exist anywhere I can find it.   Any Applications DBAs out there care to comment   on the danger of appliying the former <FONT   size=2>without first applying the latter?   matt

• Matt Adams - GE Appliances - matt.adams_at_appl.ge.com "Doing linear scans over an associative array is like trying to club someone to death with a loaded Uzi."     - Larry Wall (creator of Perl)

Received on Mon Nov 19 2001 - 11:50:05 CST