Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Next extent problem
Gene,
a shot-in-the-dark....is your 'minimum extent' size
set to 24K..? That is the only other thing that comes
to my mind
Cheers,
RS
--- Gene Gurevich <g_u_r_e_v_i_c_h_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dennis,
>
> I'm not even sure what is the uniform extents (are
> you
> talking about the LMTS?). So I think the answer is
> no
>
> Gene
> --- DENNIS WILLIAMS <DWILLIAMS_at_LIFETOUCH.COM> wrote:
> > Gene - Are you using uniform extents by any
> chance?
> > Just thought it wouldn't
> > hurt to ask.
> > Dennis Williams
> > DBA
> > Lifetouch, Inc.
> > dwilliams_at_lifetouch.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:51 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> >
> >
> > Deepak,
> >
> > thanks for the input. I have double-checked the
> > pctincrease and it is set to 0 on all tables in my
> > schema. Regarding the rounding up of the number of
> > blocks, that would have explained if the extents
> > were
> > larger than my next extents size. As it now, my
> > block
> > size is 8K. The next extent - 512K - is 64blocks.
> > The
> > extents size are either 2 or 3 blocks only.
> >
> > Gene
> > --- Deepak Thapliyal <deepakthapliyal_at_yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > > check the value of pctincrease for your table
> from
> > > user_tables/dba_tables. note that the default
> > > pctincrease for tablespace is 50. my guess
> > > pctincrease
> > > value fo your table is non-zero
> > >
> > > alternatively, the size might be attributed to
> the
> > > fact that oracle rounds the number of blocks
> that
> > > make
> > > up the extent. i forget what that is .. my tired
> > > brain
> > > cells tell me that its something like 5 blocks
> or
> > so
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > > Deepak
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Gene Gurevich <g_u_r_e_v_i_c_h_at_yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > I have two tables in my database. They both
> have
> > > > the NEXT_EXTENT set to 512K for a long time.
> Yet
> > > > all the extents for these tables are either 16
> > > > or 24K. I have checked the next extent sessing
> > > once
> > > > and again and it has always shown 512K. The
> > tables
> > > > are not being truncated. Why would Oracle
> create
> > > > the new extents with different size? Is there
> > any
> > > > other
> > > > place I need to check?
> > > >
> > > > thanks for any input
> > > >
> > > > Gene
> > > >
> > > > =====
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Find a job, post your resume.
> > > > http://careers.yahoo.com
> > > > --
> > > > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> > > > http://www.orafaq.com
> > > > --
> > > > Author: Gene Gurevich
> > > > INET: g_u_r_e_v_i_c_h_at_yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051
>
> > > FAX:
> > > > (858) 538-5051
> > > > San Diego, California -- Public
> Internet
> > > > access / Mailing Lists
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Sakthi , Raj INET: rajan_sakthi_at_yahoo.com Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).Received on Wed Nov 14 2001 - 10:11:39 CST
![]() |
![]() |