From guy.hammond@avt.co.uk Tue, 02 Oct 2001 00:52:33 -0700
From: "Guy Hammond" <guy.hammond@avt.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 00:52:33 -0700
Subject: RE: How much data can SQL*Server hold?
In-Reply-To: <ARRAY(0x87d97e4)>
Message-ID: <F001.0039E5FE.20011002010018@fatcity.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Title: How much data can SQL*Server hold?



Hi 
Lisa,
<SPAN 
class=949114907-02102001> 
About 
the biggest MSSQL implementation I am aware of is this:
<SPAN 
class=949114907-02102001> 
<A 
href="http://terraserver.homeadvisor.msn.com/terra_tech.asp">http://terraserver.homeadvisor.msn.com/terra_tech.asp
 
1.5 
terabytes on SQL Server 2000, Windows 2000 Datacenter and Compaq ProLiant. 
There's even a picture of what it looks like! :0)
<SPAN 
class=949114907-02102001> 
<SPAN 
class=949114907-02102001>g
<SPAN 
class=949114907-02102001> 

  <FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Koivu, Lisa 
  [mailto:lisa.koivu@efairfield.com]Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 
  4:50 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  How much data can SQL*Server hold?
  Hello everyone, 
  Any of you using SQL*Server on fairly large databases? 
  If so please email me directly. 
  I have a consulting company telling me they can run a 
  500GB+ database on SQL*Server with no problems and I'm pretty skeptical.  
  What's the largest implementation of SQL*Server you've seen? Does SQL*Server 
  have parallel server functionality?
  Lisa Koivu Oracle Database 
  Administrator Fairfield Resorts, Inc. 
  954-935-4117