RE: Extents size.

From: Wong, Bing <bing.wong_at_IngramMicro.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 15:22:25 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.0039E14D.20011001151527@fatcity.com>

May be it is good practice to keep number of extents to be less than 50, no matter what the size of extent.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

Hello,

I'll do an reorganization of a database (about 140 gigs). Some people say that it'd be good to use 128K, 4M and 128M extents. I saw somewhere it'd be 160K, 4M and 160M. Which size do you advice me ? I have also many small indexes (less than 16K).

Regards,

Thanh-truc Nguyen

--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Thanh-truc Nguyen
INET: truc_at_nguyen.as

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

Author: Wong, Bing
INET: bing.wong_at_IngramMicro.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------