OT about to peeve off the vegatarians: RE: OT RE: Largest

From: JOE TESTA <JTESTA_at_longaberger.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:34:30 -0700
Message-ID: <F001.0035A912.20010731104041@fatcity.com>

I love doing this:
PETA: People Eating Tasty Animals.

joe
>>> jcb_at_netsec.net 07/31/01 02:15PM >>>

or did
i mean petabytes. those are the ones that are also friendly to animals.

-----Original Message-----From: Mohan, Ross [mailto:MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com]Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:55 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: OT RE: Largest Oracle Databases
 "picobytes"? lol.....
 
 Attoboy!

-----Original Message-----From: Jon Baker [mailto:jcb_at_netsec.net]Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:56 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Largest Oracle Databases
 In theory, Oracle can handle 512 Picobytes (or roughly 512,000 Terabytes) for Oracle 8i.
 Have not heard if this has been increased for 9i.

-----Original Message----- From:
 MacGregor, Ian A. [<A
 href="mailto:ian_at_SLAC.Stanford.EDU">mailto:ian_at_SLAC.Stanford.EDU] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 8:00 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Largest Oracle Databases One of the smaller Physics projects, GLAST (Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope) is looking at storing their data in Oracle. The bulk of thge data will be a sky map of individual photons, about 20 terabytes, acquired at a rate of about 1 TB a year. What size is the largest Oracle database at present? I believe Oracle should be able to handle this, but I'd like to know if anyone has approached this size. I hear rumors of Oracle databases of hundreds of terabytes at the CIA, but I have no way to confirm them. <FONT

    size=2>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Offtopic
    I wrote a little while ago about CERN considering Oracle for     LHC project, and needing a petabyte database. It turns out that     the number was incorrect. The petabyte that was tossed around a few     years ago would be for online and secondary storage only. I don't know     their needs for tertiary storage, but our little project here , called     Babar, which is expected to store half a petabyte of data in online and     nearline storage is sized to 300 petabytes when tertiary storage is     included. The 0.5 petabytes for online and nearline will probably be     upped. If LHC has the same relationship between tertiary and     online/nearline storage, then they will need something which can handle     about 600 petabytes. Last week I attended a meeting on a project     called SuperBabar. Data estimates of size for that one are one     exabyte. I'm sure there are others in the works which will make     SuperBabar look tiny. The mind boggles.     Babar is not in Oracle and I don't expect SuperBabar will be     either.
    Ian MacGregor Stanford Linear
    Accelerator Center ian_at_slac.stanford.edu

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: <A target=_blank href="http://www.orafaq.com">http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: MacGregor, Ian A. INET: ian_at_SLAC.Stanford.EDU Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Received on Tue Jul 31 2001 - 12:34:30 CDT