Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Database Links standards
<SPAN
class=633420220-06072001>Jeff,
<SPAN
class=633420220-06072001>
Looks
ok, except that I don't think you need step b) - the PUBLIC SYNONYM for the
remote table.
I
always create a private synonym within my DBA account (which happens to own the
tables in the local database) and then create the VIEW and a PUBLIC SYNONYM on
the view to hide everything from the user. The view will say
:
<SPAN
class=633420220-06072001>
select
* from table_at_dblink.
<SPAN
class=633420220-06072001>
The
developers then get access to the view only - never to the base db-linked
tables.
<SPAN
class=633420220-06072001>
Your
approaches works for me, though. Tell the developers to use it as
delivered and to like it! :)
<SPAN
class=633420220-06072001>
hope
this helps.
Tom Mercadante <FONT face=Arial
size=2>Oracle Certified Professional
<FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Thomas Jeff
[mailto:ThomasJe_at_tce.com]Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 4:51
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Database Links standards
We came up with the below standards with respect to
database links (heavily used in our
environment). The result has been a billion complaints by
our developers, stating that the standards are unnecessarily
complex. I'm curious as to what others might
think, if they *are* indeed too complex. Also what
kind of naming/adminstrative standards that other shops employ.
![]() |
![]() |