Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RE: CURSOR_SHARING = FORCE ques. - OCP Certification
9i has come up with cursor_sharing =
similar,
which was missing till 8i. We had FORCE and
EXACT. FORCE was not what most of the DBA's were willing to use. and hence
used EXACT. But similar will do most of the job (Assumed) that we were
looking with CURSOR_SHARING.
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 08:50
AM
Subject: OT: RE: CURSOR_SHARING = FORCE
ques. - OCP Certification
Why
is it that people seem to have the need to apologize after admitting that they
are OCP certified (or are working toward the goal etc). I know that
there are a lot of differing opinions regarding OCP and what it may or may not
tell you about a particular individual, but, if your company is willing to pay
for you to pursue this then it is always (IMO) a good idea! After all,
it hopefully will provide you with some incentive to pick up some manuals and
perhaps mess with a test database and learn some new stuff. Just how
could this be a bad thing?????
<SPAN
class=062393514-03072001>
<SPAN
class=062393514-03072001>
<SPAN
class=062393514-03072001>Ken.
<SPAN
class=062393514-03072001>
<SPAN
class=062393514-03072001>
<SPAN
class=062393514-03072001>PS. I would rather be caught with an OCP
certification than be caught driving a tan minivan any
day!
<FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----From:
Ivan_Rivera_at_doh.state.fl.us
[mailto:Ivan_Rivera_at_doh.state.fl.us]Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001
6:33 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: CURSOR_SHARING = FORCE
ques.
Gurus....
Well the boss is now getting on my back for me to upgrade my
OCP to 8i. I know, I know, I wasn't going to, please don't flame me,
but work is insisting that I do. So now I'm studying the upgrade book
and it's sparked up a couple of questions regarding cursor_sharing =
force.
![]() |
![]() |