Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: PFILE location in NT
The
database creation is part of a server build which is restored to every new
server. The PFILE parameter is specified but like I said I have been successful
in finding the right PFILE only after making the changes and restarting the
databases and checking if the changes have taken effect. But I am limited to do
this only at night when no one is logged in. Thank God these are not 24x7
databases.
<SPAN
class=475411904-04072001>
<SPAN
class=475411904-04072001>Shahid.
<FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Hillman, Alex
[mailto:Alex.Hillman_at_usmint.treas.gov]Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001
6:17 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
RE: PFILE location in NT
It
was true for versions before 8.1. Beginning with 8.1 default is the same as in
unix - $ORACLE_HOME/dbs
<FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>
Alex
Hillman
<FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: DEMANCHE Luc (Cetelem)
[mailto:Luc.Demanche_at_cetelem.fr]Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 6:20
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
PFILE location in NT
Hi
Shahid,
<SPAN
class=991361609-03072001>Did you specify a PFILE parameter in your startup
?
If
not, o<FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial
size=2>n NT, the default location for the
parameter file is ORACLE_HOME\database. Your database is using the
file in this location.
<SPAN
class=991361609-03072001>
<SPAN
class=991361609-03072001>Luc
-----Message d'origine-----De: Shahid Nasir [mailto:shahidnasir_at_emirates.com]Date: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 11:30 AMÀ: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LObjet: PFILE location in NT Hi all, I have two parameter files in two different directories on the same machine. Is there a way I can find out which parameter file is being used by the database. One way I tried was to make the changes in one file and see if it takes effect when the database is restarted. but I have more than 52 machines and it will be time consuming to do the same for all machines especially when these machines are on remote locations. Thanks. Shahid.Received on Tue Jul 03 2001 - 23:29:33 CDT
![]() |
![]() |