Re: Problem with many (160 - 170) sessions in the database on NT

There are several Oracle tech notes that discuss NT and Windows 2000 Server Memory/Process architecture issues and limitations. I'll look around and post anything I can find quick without having to go back to Metalink.

If I recall correctly, Windows 2000 Advanced Server for RAM>=4G requires XEON processors. With that, you can also have cpus>4.

regards,
ep

On 29 May 2001, at 8:50, Jonas A Wetterberg wrote:

...

> Now I have heard the Windows NT have a limit of how much memory one process
> might use, and that limit is somewhere around 1,7 G, and that that might be
> our problem.
>
> We are planing to upgrade to Oracle 8.1.7 and to Windows NT 4 Enterprise
> Edition or to Windows 2000 Advanced Server. Does anyone know if this can
> help? Should we put more memory or more processes in the machine?
...

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: PierceED_at_csus.edu

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).