Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: parallel load performance
I got SQL*Loader to run faster in parallel. I was loading a 8 million record file that was about 800-bytes wide. What I wound up doing was splitting the file into n separate files.
My control file looked similar to yours, except it didn't have the INFILE parameter... I called sqlldr with the DATA= parameter on the command line. You may want to try this.
Kevin Toepke
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 7:16 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I'm getting slower loads using parallel than a serial load. I set up a test case and am pasting it for you to see what I am doing wrong.
<snip>
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Toepke, Kevin M
INET: ktoepke_at_cms.cendant.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists --------------------------------------------------------------------To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Received on Fri Apr 27 2001 - 06:51:39 CDT
![]() |
![]() |