Re: Oracle's pricing

At 01:33 PM 4/25/01 -0800, you wrote:
>As for DB2, it has a few issues where if you
>try and do certain things you really do end up very close to an Oracle
>price.
>

[ahem] Apologies Kimberly, but this sounds very much like an apologist stance. At the end of your posting, you are saying "you shouldn't be concerned that DB2 is tons cheaper than Oracle because in some cases it isn't". Well, maybe, but so what? If you do a business analysis, and they come out close in price (I could do one right now where Oracle would come out cheaper), then buy Oracle. If the reverse, buy DB2. If Oracle is the incumbent, then retraining costs etc become a cost factor. If you're just starting out, then costs may be the primary or *only* factor.

I think this is a case of the market voting with its wallet. That's how things are *supposed* to work.

Dennis Taylor

        A study akin to numerology and astrology, but lacking
        the precision of the former, and the success of the latter.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: ismgr_at_pctc.com

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).