Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Log Buffer
Yeah,
illustrioius, that's good thing isn't it? Isn't that what someone called
Lord Vador in Star Wars.....noo non no, it was Jabba the hut. Ok, I take
back the illustrious, I'll think of some other large word that sounds
cool!
I
don't, it was just a question, when you don't know for sure you might as well
ask the experts.
<FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: root_at_fatcity.com
[mailto:root_at_fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Mohan, RossSent:
Friday, March 23, 2001 2:32 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: Log Buffer
"illustrious"?
oh my. I can see I am going to have to be
even more frivolous, irreverent, and non-topical.
<thinking out loud>..."gee, if I had a 4 GB SGA,
I guess i'd need a 400 Megabyte log buffer...yea,
sure, that makes sense...."</thinking out
loud>
-----Original Message----- From: Kevin
Kostyszyn [<A
href="mailto:kevin_at_dulcian.com">mailto:kevin_at_dulcian.com] <FONT
size=2>Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 9:36 AM To:
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Log
Buffer
Hello DBA's
You know, I read
somewhere that you can make your log_buffer 10 percent of <FONT
size=2>your total sga. So if you had a 500mb sga you could have a 50
mb log_buffer? What do you guys think, the
illustrious Ross doesn't like such large
log_buffers.
Sincerely, Kevin Kostyszyn
DBA Dulcian, Inc <FONT
size=2>www.dulcian.com kevin_at_dulcian.com
![]() |
![]() |