Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: (Win2K vs NT4) / RE: OT RE: Async I/O on Windows
<SPAN
class=853234122-05022001>Actually I don't. Its usually something else that
gets me to
reboot
the system (which is still rare) but these are pretty low use
databases.
The
real ones are on Unix or Sun.
<FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Mohan, Ross
[mailto:MohanR_at_STARS-SMI.com]Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 1:38
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
(Win2K vs NT4) / RE: OT RE: Async I/O on Windows
Do you crash weekly?
-----Original Message----- From:
Kimberly Smith [<A
href="mailto:kimberly.smith_at_gmd.fujitsu.com">mailto:kimberly.smith_at_gmd.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 3:21 PM <FONT
size=2>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <FONT
size=2>Subject: RE: (Win2K vs NT4) / RE: OT RE: Async I/O on Windows
I am running ORacle8i on Windows2000 and for what I use
it for I see no difference from NT.
-----Original Message----- Sent:
Monday, February 05, 2001 11:06 AM To: Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-L
Ross & Mark, There are no major
performance concerns here (and we get Oracle "free"
{system wide educational site license} - unlike
MS/SQL), so what I want to know is: does Oracle8 <FONT
size=2>generally work well on Windows 2000 server (compared to
running it on NT4)? We will be running on this
hardware: IBM Netfinity5100 w/ RAID (dedicated Oracle
server, w/ web server on same box, if
possible).
My assumption is that Win2k/Oracle8 is "ok". Are there
any horror stories out there about running Oracle8 on
Win2K where running on NT4 would have been
better?
thanks! ep
On 5 Feb 2001, at 9:25, Mark Leith wrote:
Date sent:
Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:25:25
-0800 <FONT
size=2>To:
Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
> RE: Async I/O on WindowsWOOOOHOOOOOOO a SQLServer vs.
Oracle debate again!!
...