Cached sequences performance

From: Alex Hillman <alex_hillman_at_physia.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:42:12 -0500
Message-Id: <10680.122004@fatcity.com>

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C04E51.74A56010
Content-Type: text/plain;

charset="iso-8859-1"

Anybody knows is there a big difference in performance between cached and non cached sequences. Theoretically should be but I would be interested if anybody did any measurments.

Alex Hillman

------_=_NextPart_001_01C04E51.74A56010
Content-Type: text/html;

charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>Cached sequences performance</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

Anybody knows is there a big =
difference in performance between cached and non cached sequences. = Theoretically should be but I would be interested if anybody did any = measurments.

Alex Hillman


</BODY>
</HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C04E51.74A56010-- Received on Tue Nov 14 2000 - 09:42:12 CST