Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: interesting tnsping times...
Hey you're not alone there, were on Oracle 7.3.4.4 too !
The only difference being, we *know* why management hasn't upgraded - They
are trying to call Oracle's bluff about not supporting v7 past Dec 31, 2K
!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: John Dailey [mailto:John.Dailey_at_concept-solutions.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 4:33 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: interesting tnsping times...
Sorry! Firewall, but everything is taking place behind it. No Oracle Names environment. We are on 7.3.4.4. No laughing! There is a very good reason we haven't upgraded.... it's just that management won't tell me.
=)
just can't logically accept the fact that this one lone machine takes 10 times longer to TNSPING the database when the PING times are the same as all the other clients. I even have other NT machines here (and Win95)... all the same except for this one.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:49 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
more info, pls.
going through a firewall? ( if so, which one?)
oracle names environment?
mts or dedicated ( don't think this matters..but)
database version?
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:56 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hey folks, got an interesting problem here... maybe I'm missing something so
I need some help:
I have an NT machine that is acting as our reports server/OAS for a web
reporting solution. This has performed terribly for us in many
environments, but that is beside the point.
Anyway, I can ping our server with excellent response times (<10 msec) from
this NT machine. The problem is when I tnsping80 the instance, I get
HORRIBLE times ( 5100 - 5300 msec). From any other client, I get response
times from tnsping80 between 600-760 msec. It is just this one machine that
is having the "problem". The tnsnames.ora files on this NT machine and the
clients are the same.
Any thoughts, experiences, or suggestions?
John Dailey
Consultant
Concept Solutions, LLC
*Your Business Intelligence Partner*
www.concept-solutions.com
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: John Dailey
INET: John.Dailey_at_concept-solutions.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Liststo: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: John Dailey
INET: John.Dailey_at_concept-solutions.com
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Liststo: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may Received on Tue Nov 07 2000 - 16:02:24 CST
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
![]() |
![]() |