Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: naming convention tablespaces
Why not make it descriptive like:
APPLICATION_DATA_64K APPLICATION_DATA_512K APPLICATION_DATA_1M APPLICATION_DATA_8M
Rodd Holman
Enterprise Data Systems Engineer
LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation
rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com
Comments made are my own opinions and views. They do not represent views,
policies, or procedures of LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: nlzanen1_at_ey.nl [mailto:nlzanen1_at_ey.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 8:00 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: naming convention tablespaces
Hi All,
I am in the proces of putting together a reorg plan for one of my
databases.
We now have 1(one) data tablespace with a mixture of extent sizes
(generally too small).
This tablespace is called "<application>data".
I want to have say 5 tablespaces with different extent sizes and don't use the storage clauses for the individual tables but rather lett the tablespace decide the storage clause a table will have. What (if any) is the standard for naming the tablespaces??
I was thinking "<application>data_S" "<application>data_M" etc. etc.
Jack
-- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: nlzanen1_at_ey.nl Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: ListGuru_at_fatcity.com (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You mayReceived on Wed Nov 01 2000 - 08:51:33 CST
![]() |
![]() |