| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RAID
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0403A.F7D5CC90
Content-Type: text/plain
Actually NetApp uses their own version of RAID 4. No comment on NetApp (last time it got me in trouble) ;)
Regards,
Satar
> -----Original Message----- > From: Holman, Rodney [SMTP:rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com] > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 3:31 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: RE: RAID > > We are running RAID 5 on EMC Symetrix here. The cache on the Sym box does > an excellent job of keeping up with Oracle. If I were working with a > standard array I would more likely lean towards the RAID 0+1. I've never > used it, but the NetApp Filer discussed in another thread uses a RAID 3 > implementation. Anyone have any ideas on that?? > > Rodd Holman > Enterprise Data Systems Engineer > LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation > rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com > Comments made are my own opinions and views. They do not represent views, > policies, or procedures of LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation > > >
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0403A.F7D5CC90
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: RAID</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Actually NetApp uses =
their own version of RAID 4. No comment on NetApp (last time it got me =
in trouble) ;)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Regards,<BR>
Satar</FONT>
</P>
<UL>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">From: </FONT></B> <FONT =
SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">Holman, Rodney =
[SMTP:rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com]</FONT>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">Sent: </FONT></B> <FONT =
SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">Friday, October 27, 2000 3:31 PM</FONT>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 =
FACE=3D"Arial">To: </FONT></B> <FONT SIZE=3D1 =
FACE=3D"Arial">Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L</FONT>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D1 =
FACE=3D"Arial">Subject: </FONT>=
</B> <FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"Arial">RE: RAID</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">We are running RAID 5 on EMC Symetrix =
here. The cache on the Sym box does</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">an excellent job of keeping up with =
Oracle. If I were working with a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">standard array I would more likely =
lean towards the RAID 0+1. I've never</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">used it, but the NetApp Filer =
discussed in another thread uses a RAID 3</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">implementation. Anyone have any =
ideas on that??</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Rodd Holman</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Enterprise Data Systems =
Engineer</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">LodgeNet Entertainment =
Corporation</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Comments made are my own opinions and =
views. They do not represent views,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">policies, or procedures of LodgeNet =
Entertainment Corporation</FONT>
Received on Fri Oct 27 2000 - 12:25:57 CDT
 |
 |