Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: RAID

RE: RAID

From: Weaver, Walt <wweaver_at_rightnow.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:35:37 -0600
Message-Id: <10662.120493@fatcity.com> 





This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C04044.B692DEAA


Content-Type: text/plain;


        charset="iso-8859-1"



This implies that you've had some bad experiences with NetApp. I wouldn't
mind hearing about'em. We've just starting using NetApp filers as our nfs
servers and haven't had any problems, yet...
 


--Walt Weaver


  Bozeman, Montana, USA



-----Original Message-----


From: Satar Naghshineh [mailto:Satar.Naghshineh_at_irvine.mellesgriot.com]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:37 PM


To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: RAID





Actually NetApp uses their own version of RAID 4. No comment on NetApp (last
time it got me in trouble) ;) 



Regards,


Satar 



        -----Original Message----- 


From:   Holman, Rodney [SMTP:rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com] 
Sent:   Friday, October 27, 2000 3:31 PM 

To:     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
Subject:        RE: RAID 

	We are running RAID 5 on EMC Symetrix here.  The cache on the Sym


box does 


an excellent job of keeping up with Oracle.  If I were working with a 
standard array I would more likely lean towards the RAID 0+1.  I've never 
used it, but the NetApp Filer discussed in another thread uses a RAID 3 
implementation.  Anyone have any ideas on that?? 



        Rodd Holman 


Enterprise Data Systems Engineer 


LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation 


rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com 


Comments made are my own opinions and views. They do not represent views, 
policies, or procedures of LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation 






------_=_NextPart_001_01C04044.B692DEAA


Content-Type: text/html;


        charset="iso-8859-1"



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD>

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<TITLE>RE: RAID</TITLE>




<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2920.0" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>

<BODY>

<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=823273918-27102000>This 

implies that you've had some bad experiences with NetApp. I wouldn't mind 
hearing about'em. We've just starting using NetApp filers as our nfs servers and 
haven't had any problems, yet...</SPAN></FONT></DIV>


<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN 

class=823273918-27102000></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>


<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=823273918-27102000>--Walt 

Weaver</SPAN></FONT></DIV>


<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=823273918-27102000>&nbsp; 

Bozeman, Montana, USA</SPAN></FONT></DIV>


<BLOCKQUOTE>



  <DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Satar Naghshineh 
  [mailto:Satar.Naghshineh_at_irvine.mellesgriot.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, 
  October 27, 2000 12:37 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Multiple recipients of list 
  ORACLE-L<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: RAID<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
  <P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Actually NetApp uses their own 
  version of RAID 4. No comment on NetApp (last time it got me in trouble) 
  ;)</FONT> </P>


  <P><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2>Regards,<BR>Satar</FONT> </P>
  <UL>


    <P><FONT face=Arial size=1>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><B><FONT 

    face=Arial size=1>From:&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></B> <FONT face=Arial 
    size=1>Holman, Rodney [SMTP:rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com]</FONT> <BR><B><FONT 
    face=Arial size=1>Sent:&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></B> <FONT face=Arial 
    size=1>Friday, October 27, 2000 3:31 PM</FONT> <BR><B><FONT face=Arial 
    size=1>To:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></B> <FONT face=Arial 
    size=1>Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L</FONT> <BR><B><FONT face=Arial 
    size=1>Subject:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></B> <FONT 
    face=Arial size=1>RE: RAID</FONT> </P>


    <P><FONT face=Arial size=2>We are running RAID 5 on EMC Symetrix here.&nbsp; 
    The cache on the Sym box does</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>an 
    excellent job of keeping up with Oracle.&nbsp; If I were working with 
    a</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>standard array I would more likely lean 
    towards the RAID 0+1.&nbsp; I've never</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>used it, but the NetApp Filer discussed in another thread uses a RAID 
    3</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>implementation.&nbsp; Anyone have any 
    ideas on that??</FONT> </P>


    <P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Rodd Holman</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial 

    size=2>Enterprise Data Systems Engineer</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>rodney.holman_at_lodgenet.com</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial 
    size=2>Comments made are my own opinions and views. They do not represent 


    views,</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>policies, or procedures of 
    LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation</FONT> 
Received on Fri Oct 27 2000 - 13:35:37 CDT












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US