RE: Re[2]: Re[2]:Upgrading Oracle

From: Rachel Carmichael <carmichr_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 20:24:22 GMT
Message-Id: <10660.120221@fatcity.com>

they say the have a client who has like 3 million rows and has no performance problems. If we grow the way we expect to, I'll have many many more rows than that!

>From: "Jim Conboy" <Jim.Conboy_at_trw.com>
>Reply-To: ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L_at_fatcity.com>
>Subject: RE: Re[2]: Re[2]:Upgrading Oracle
>Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 08:35:29 -0800
>
>Yup, I'm singin' the same blues. I find that usually these things work
>GREAT in the vendor's teeny-tiny test database. It continually amazes them
>how performance can degrade when you put the thing into an actual
>customer's environment.
>
>Jim
>

---

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. Received on Wed Oct 25 2000 - 15:24:22 CDT